Linkagent

Linkilo alternative

The open source Linkilo alternative

WordPress link suggestions with cannibalization reports. Here is how Linkagent compares, including where Linkilo is the better fit.

Free scan, no account needed. Takes about 20 seconds.

Feature comparison: Linkagent vs Linkilo. Competitor details are summarized from public information and may change; check their site for current specifics.
FeatureLinkagentLinkilo
Open source & self-hostable

AGPL-3.0 platform, MIT embed script

YesNo
Platform supportAny site that serves HTMLWordPress only
Anchor text sourceOnly phrases already in your copySuggested in-editor; you place and edit them
ImplementationInjected via 2 KB script, plugin, or API; content never rewrittenWrites links into post content
Free optionFree no-account scan + free self-hosting (AGPL); hosted from $19/moPaid license
Works without an AI key

Linkagent's crawler and scoring run with no AI configured

Yesn/a (closed system)
Review queue with persistent decisionsYesVaries by workflow

Where Linkilo is strong

  • Goes beyond linking into diagnosis: keyword cannibalization and anchor over-use reports
  • Sentence-level suggestion placement inside the editor
  • One of the more analysis-minded options in the WordPress ecosystem

Where it falls short

  • WordPress-only and closed source
  • Still fundamentally a suggest-then-edit workflow; implementation and upkeep stay manual
  • Links written into content persist as database edits, like all in-editor tools

The honest verdict

Linkilo's pitch is diagnosis: it doesn't just suggest links, it tells you where your anchor text repeats too much and where two posts compete for the same query. Those reports are genuinely the right things to look at (anchor distribution and cannibalization are exactly what a careful SEO checks by hand), and bundling them into a WordPress plugin is a fair offer for WordPress-native teams.

The gap is between reporting a problem and closing the loop on it. Linkilo surfaces issues and hands you an editor; you still place, phrase, and maintain every link, post by post. Linkagent bakes the same concerns into the pipeline itself: anchor variety isn't a report you read, it's a constraint the scorer enforces (no anchor exceeding about a third of a target's profile); orphans aren't a list, they get priority in the suggestion queue automatically; and shipped links are maintained across re-crawls without anyone opening an editor. It is the difference between a dashboard that describes work and an agent that does the work under your review.

As with every WordPress-native tool in this list, platform reach and openness split the audience: if you're all-WordPress and want in-editor analysis, Linkilo is a defensible pick; if you want the whole loop automated, other platforms covered, or the ability to read and run the code yourself, that's Linkagent's side of the table.

Frequently asked questions

Does Linkagent detect keyword cannibalization like Linkilo?
Not as a named report today. Its topic clustering does surface groups of highly similar pages (which is where cannibalization lives), and its anchor-diversity rules prevent the linking side of the problem. For query-level cannibalization analysis, Search Console remains the primary source either way.
Which is better for a non-technical site owner?
Linkagent's flow is arguably simpler: run a scan, approve suggestions, install a plugin once. There are no dictionaries to configure or reports to interpret before value shows up. The free checker gives a taste in 20 seconds.

Other comparisons

See what your site is missing

Run a free scan. No account needed, results in about 20 seconds.

Free scan, no account needed. Takes about 20 seconds.